Part of the problem stems from the monster share of fans and discredits the facts. As one reviewer from Amazon's description of the end user blog, "Monster Cable has been a big enthusiast - sharp views, the two sides flew back and forth message boards and newsgroups verbal attack, when their names like the beleaguered reputation. "
How do you think? Monster is growing injustice of the penalty for that? Or monster turbine companies enabling them to as well?
We have our own headphones review early next year, holidays.
To be fair, some blogs turbines have been reviewed favourably. It is also worth noting the Amazon comments can be written by anyone, including those from other manufacturers (we do not accuse others of things) public relations sales representative. But it is rare you can see almost every "reviewers" getting a star product (at the time of writing this article there were 11 1 star reviews, a four star reviews).
Personally, I think this is dangerous manufacturer, by far marketing hyperbole, particularly if you are entering a more mature market. Yes you want to cause a stir, but provided for under title and is in danger.
Monster in its press release said that the turbines are "the world's first driver specially designed for high performance in-ear headphones deliver impeccable high fidelity sound quality. "Well, this is not correct. Shure vocal audio quality earplugs. Tympanic, too. And several other companies will make the same claim.
No comments:
Post a Comment